Unfair To Whom? Illegal Aliens or US Emancipated Slaves, Part 4
On surface, abolishing Anchorism, rescinding citizenships, and even deporting illegal aliens either by round-up or attrition procedures including legislation-law enforcement, seems unfair to those who became victims of the La Raza deception by their willful participation in international border incursion crimes against the citizens of the United States for which they are beginning to reap the consequences.
What is or is not fair in any circumstance is actually relative to whom warrants such a concern with the intent of finding favor in judicial matters (judges and/or juries), designated official decision makers, family relations, et al.
However, when it comes to the Constitution of the United States, the nature of that sacred Congressional legislation is fairness in favor of the US citizen for whom it was created for in order to resolve societal matters by protective arm or force of government.
Often the idea of fairness is enrapt with prejudicial and emotional bias, whereas the Constitution devoid emotion, but is rather unrelentingly cold in its guiding stand and/or guardianship which is always balanced in favor of the citizens of the United States.
This imbalanced position in the affairs of this America is especially when the fate of the nation is at stake and depending on right decisions by our designated government officials.
Therefore, fair in this light is anytime that a controversy presented to the nation, despite pains, sufferings, turmoil, discomfort, economic upheaval, disturbance to the general peace even by Civil War (1860-1865) which was around the Constitutional existence of chattel slaves in the United States, favors the concerns to its citizens first over those of foreigners or illegal aliens.
In the matter of Anchor legislation and enforcement not being fair to illegal aliens if retroactive if completely unfair to US citizens, as well as legitimate immigrant citizen candidates who are obeying our federal immigration laws.
In Comparison
When considering the continued insufferable fate of the Emancipated Slaves in comparison to the willful discomfort of illegal aliens, the two experiences are not even minutely equated, and to do so desecrates the American Civil Rights Legacy rendering it and laws associated with it, nullified.
Furthermore, the Emancipated Slave or Freedman citizens actually have special Constitutional standing and protections, whereas the illegal alien is not even mentioned in the great legislation. In fact other than "White citizens" and Indians, nor other ethno-racial group or class of peoples have such honorable mention, especially not three consecutive Amendments accompanied by a special Constitutionally codified Congressional Act as does the Emancipated Slave - Freedman.
While there is great caring concern for the seemingly “unfair” fate of illegal aliens, it would be completely devastating, un-Constitutional to the Emancipated Slave citizens and mostly morally reprehensive in the sight of GOD should any aspects of Anchorism or the Reagan Amnesty be allowed to continue.
Amnesties For Illegal Aliens or Reparations For Emancipated Slave Freedman
The amount of resources to support continued Anchorism, the Reagan or any other amnesty, is on the level of a Reparations to a people whom the United States has done no harm to, but rather a rewarding of them for breaking our laws.
If amnesties and “presumed citizenships” on any level is to be awarded to foreign civilian invaders and occupiers of our country, then Reparations should be granted to the Emancipated Slaves without controversy.
It would be more apropos that such treatment were afforded to the Emancipated Slaves on behalf of their ancestors, who in the sight of GOD, the Supreme Judge of the Earth, were brought against their will to America by the British Empire in chains-shackles and not willing international border criminals as are illegal aliens.
Slap In The Face of Founding Fathers and Military Personnel
Furthermore, to continue this unlawful procedure would be a deadly strike to the face of our Founding Fathers and the young men who struggled and died in the US Civil War, as well as all the other Americans fallen in conflict for the ideals of America.
The cause of Emancipated Slave Freedman is that which our military personal gave their all for and not for illegal aliens, despite their comparatively minuscule sufferings for a crime they committed against themselves
In Closing: The Analogy:
There is but one chair in the Court Room of Justice before the GOD, the Supreme Judge of the Earth where America’s fate as a nation based in the lofty ideals of its Declaration of Independence engendered by a Constitution with Amendments, will rest according to whom the people thereof grants the right to sit…either illegal aliens or American US, Emancipated Slave citizens.
Which ever of these two people that “We the people” decides or chooses to sit in the “chair” will determine the destiny of the United States. Though they will suffer, one of these two people will have to give up or relinquish the "seat", i.e., their citizenship status and return to their homelands in peace with the full support of the American people.
The two citizenship status's in American can't co-equally exist. Fairness to illegal aliens is criminal against Emancipated Slave - Freedmen. For illegal aliens to live is for Emancipated Slave Freedmen to die.
Which will it be, America? Which? The illegal aliens or the US citizen.
Continue to Part 5, Final Constitutional Warning (+)
Return to Part 3 Danger of Non-Retroactive Law (+)
