![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
continued from Part I - EXPERIENCE Not Skin Color, Nor Racial Characteristics
Constitutional Description of Chattel Slaves Beneficiaries of the Civil Rights
Therefore, the term, Hispanic-Latino is a modern day contrivance for the sake of staking claim in American US Civil Rights benefits and legacy belonging only to the peoples spoken of in the Constitutional Civil Rights of 1866
Indians, who were considered Red in skin-color were mentioned once in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, Section 1 with the statement "...excluding Indians not taxed..."
Nowhere in the document is Hispanic, Latino, Mexican nor illegal alien even mentioned or alluded to.
Besides, the only people who could qualify as the "colored race" per se, are the folks with the racial characteristics that are natural to the West African region of Africa and diametrically opposite to Whites.
They are the folks with the most unique and dramatically different facial and muscle form covered by Black or Negroid (Spanish for black) skin color, which again is indeed the very opposite of Euro-American immigrant Whites.
The second most defining racial characteristic is the hair texture of the slaves being wooly, kinky, nappy, unlike that of Anglo-Euro-American White peoples, Indians, Hispanic, Latino, Mexican, all of which is straight.
Also, when slave owning Christians or later those who were pro-Jim Crow laws of racial discrimination and segregation would describe the people whom the deemed were justly slated by GOD to be in such degrading conditions based on the Bible, it is the Chattel Slaves who are identified as having the Negroid features, such as the "Mark of Cain" and the "Curse of Ham" etc., not the "Bronze-Brown" skin of Mexican-Hispanic/Latino, or that of the Red Indian.
However, though for obvious reasons race-color is mentioned in the landmark Congressional ACT, the real evidential statement that identifies those who are identified as having STANDING in this matter, are as the following: Section 1 "...regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude", Section 2 "... on account of such person having at any time been held in a condition of slavery or involuntary servitude...", Section 4 "...previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude...".
Though they have their suffering of today and the past, the Hispanic/Latino-Mexicans were never held in chattel "slavery or involuntary servitude" by the government and peoples of the United States of America.
However, such treatment was conducted by indigenous peoples of Central America before the Spaniard Conquestadors arrived there, who later did enslave all ethnic tribes of the region under the Spanish government.
|
||