The Meaning of…

 

"White Citizens" and Emancipated Slaves, Freedmen-Freemen, Refugees, Part I

“…as is enjoyed by White citizens”

According To The Edicts of The 14th Amendment of the

1866 Civil Rights Act of the US Constitution

The term "White Citizens" is not a racist or racial pejorative or affront to US citizens who happen to be of Euro-American White-Caucasian, but rather simply one of Constitutional distinction. 

"White Citizens" is the correct Constitutional name or identity of all American Citizen immigrants, that is, folks primarily from Caucasian (White) European countries who willingly emigrated to the USA , particularly from England and British Isles, later followed by others of continental Europe are the “White citizens” who legally enjoy the fruits of American Independence and Freedom to exercise core conservative values.  1866 Civil Rights Act, Section 1 (+)

Actually, "White citizens" is a term for any and all willing immigrants beginning from James Town, Virginia to Plymouth Rock, Massachusetts are of that classification.   Such distinction holds true beyond skin color, racial features, or even national origin and ethnicity. 

In fact, Yellow Asians, Brown East Indians, or even Black Africans are "White citizens" based on the naturalization laws for immigration into the United States of America.  Apparently, "White citizens" simply means American who are enjoying all the being willing US citizens, because it was/is their sacred quest.

The slaves were not willing US citizens.  Such a state was a result of being under the jurisdiction of the United States since 1776, when they were inherited from the British Empire...not having a choice in the matter.

However, it is to be noted the the Freemen who not slaves as the "Freedmen", did have a choice even as the White European willing immigrants.

The Emancipated Slaves, Freedmen-Freemen, Refugees are what I define as the West African, Americanized slaves and their children or descendants, who were freed from the bondage of the peculiar chattel slave institution of the nation by the Emancipation Proclamation, the Northern States victory over those of the Southern Confederacy, and its Constitutional legislation of the 13th, 14th, 15th Amendment and the 1866 Civil Rights Act.

It was/is the legislation of the 14th Amendment which technically granted citizenship to the Emancipated Slaves who happens to Black, Colored, etc. 

The term, "Emancipated Slave" is in no way meant to cause discomfort or trepidations in White Americans, but rather simply identifying the actual state of affairs of those who were freed from slavery as well as their succeeding generations of offspring living today in the United States. 

Though according to the edicts of the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, technically, "on paper", Black West African Americans are indeed US citizens, but for whatever reasons be it by our own undoing or caused by someone else, factually or practically, they as a people are not reaping Constitutional benefits on the same equitable levels as the willing "White citizens".

While being all kinds of identifying names for us ranging from Africans, Niggras, Niggers, Negro (* Spanish-Latin terms), Colored, Afro-American, Black, African American, et al, the name "Emancipated Slaves, Freedmen" is a terminology that finally removes race and color out of the discussion, thereby making the matters of Civil Rights one of experience and Constitutional Law and spiritual-moral rectitude...not skin color or racial features and/or characteristics.

Emancipated Slaves, American Emancipated Slaves, Emancipated US Slave Citizens, Freedmen, et al, has nothing to with with minority nor majority status, but rather, that which is experiential when it comes to implementing the very special Constitutional mandated Civil Rights to the proper beneficiaries.

Ironically, to the detriment of the illegal alien populations seeking salvation for Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, the La Raza activist fatally blundered their movement when they followed the failed example of Jesse Jackson, the god-father of racial-money shakedown of American corporations, and foolishly made US Civil Rights an issue based on "Brown-Bronze" skin color.

The Radical Republican architects of the Triad Amendments granted the Emancipated Slaves, Freedmen and Freemen such special Constitutional status like no other ethno-racial demographic group in the United States was not due latter's skin-color or unique racial characteristics, but rather due the horrid experience by which they were brought into this "New Nation".

Hispanic/Latino-Mexican illegal aliens do not qualify for any of the Triad Amendments because their experience of crossing a nation's border illegally does not equate with that of the West African chattel slaves journey into America.  In fact, no Black African who comes to the United States as a willing immigrant has not STANDING in this matter either.

Color, Race, In The 14th Amendment and Civil Rights Act of 1866

It must be understood that when this special legislation was enacted in the 1860's, there was absolutely no thought for illegal aliens in it, nor Hispanic/Latino peoples, nor Mexicans or anyone else who did not have the unique experience that the "New Nation" fought a civil war about.

 

The people of subject were/are those who were chattel slaves and just so happen to be the unique skin-color and racial characteristics that we call Negro, Afro and African American, Colored People, even Niggras or Niggers as it stated in the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights of 1866.

 

In these Constitutional legislative documents are the terms, "of every race and color", "by reason of his color or race", " without distinction of race or color".

 

It is a fact, that the only "people of color" or those who were the opposite of "White citizens" i.e., Anglo and European immigrants were either Indians - Native folks (Red) and the West African slaves (Black), not Hispanic/Latino who are a White ethnicity, nor Mexican which is a nationality.

  • Hispanic is a term that comes from the European peninsula of Hesperia, Hispanole - Spain, but popularized during the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Administration;

  • Latino is from the European region known as Italy of the ancient Latin language

  • Mexican is a nationality

 

Therefore, the term, Hispanic-Latino is a modern day contrivance for the sake of staking claim in American US Civil Rights Legacy belonging only to the peoples spoken of in the Civil Rights of 1866

 

Indians, who were considered Red in skin-color were mentioned once in the Civil Rights Act of 1866, Section 1 with the statement "...excluding Indians not taxed..."

 

Nowhere in the document is Hispanic, Latino, Mexican nor illegal alien even mentioned or alluded to.

 

Besides, the only  people who could qualify as the "colored race" per se, are the folks with the racial characteristics that are natural to the West African region of Africa and diametrically opposite to Whites.

 

They are the folks with the most unique and dramatically different facial and muscle form covered by Black or Negroid (Spanish for black) skin color, which again is indeed the very opposite of Euro-American immigrant Whites.

 

The second most defining racial characteristic is the hair texture of the slaves being wooly, kinky, nappy, unlike that of Anglo-Euro-American White peoples, Indians, Hispanic, Latino, Mexican, all of which is straight.

 

Also, when slave owning Christians or later those who were pro-Jim Crow laws of racial discrimination and segregation would describe the people whom the deemed were justly slated by GOD to be in such degrading conditions based on the Bible, it was the Blacks were identified as having the Negroid features, such as the "Mark of Cain" and the "Curse of Ham" etc., not the "Bronze-Brown" skin of Mexican-Hispanic/Latino, or that of the Red Indian.

 

However, though for obvious reasons race-color is mentioned in the ACT, the real evidential statement that identifies those who are identified as having STANDING in this matter, are as the following: Section 1 "...regard to any previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude", Section 2 "... on account of such person having at any time been held in a condition of slavery or involuntary servitude...", Section 4 "...previous condition of slavery or involuntary servitude...".

 

The Freedmen's, Bureau

The ACT provided an agency under the US Military to specifically provide protection and enforcement of the ACT on behalf of the Emancipated Slaves known in Section 3 as "...the Bureau for the relief of Freedmen and Refugees..." and Section 4 as "...the officers and agents of the Freedmens Bureau..."

 

Hispanics, Latinos, Mexican, nor anyone else regardless of their race, skin-color, nationality or ethnicity has no right STANDING in this special protections because they are not Freedmen or Refugees from the US Civil War.  The Freedmen's Bureau obviously needs to be reloaded for the Freedmen and yet Refugees from the ongoing US Civil War.

 

Finally, the 14th Amendment for the Emancipated Slaves, now Freedmen was proceeded by the 13th, which was granted not because of their skin-color or racial characteristics, but rather because of the previous state of chattel slavery.

 

Mexicans, Hispanics, Latinos, nor Indians had such an experience, therefore they are not qualified for STANDING in the ACT, even as willing Black African immigrants are not either.

 

If these afore mentioned folks can prove by experience as described in the ACT, then they too have STANDING.  If not, they must seek solace for their suffering elsewhere, perhaps in the country of their origin.

 

The whole "race, skin-color" argument is rouse by the foreign and domestic enemies of our New Nation.

Whether the late Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was cognizant or not, I believe that GOD prophetically through him gave us insight and subtle warning to know those amongst us who would pimp race or skin color as a means to gain prosperity, prestige and power in these United States.

It is sort of like when Jesus Christ speaks of false messengers as wolves, etc. saying "You shall know them by their fruits"...Dr. King says "content of character"

"I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. August 28,1963 "I Have A Dream" Speech

THE INVADERS ARE  CAUGHT BY SURPRISE

You see, as US Emancipated Slave Citizens, we do love GOD.  We do love America.  We do love our fellow US "White Citizens" (White, Brown, Red, Yellow, Black)

For more See Part II of White Citizens - Emancipated Slaves (+)

American Emancipated Slave: An Explication (+)

 

See Nullifying The Race Weapon Part I (+)

        Nullifying The Race Weapon Part II (+)

 

Calamitous State of American Blacks (+)

Whose Civil Rights Anyway ? (+)

Please See   The 1866 Civil Rights (+)

                 The 14th Amendment (+)

              Gettysburg Address (+)

                               The Emancipation Proclamation (+)

                                                  The Emancipation Proclamation-Background (+)

                                The Declaration of Independence (+)

                        "I Have A Dream" Speech (+)

 
 

 

The Hayes Campaign (+)

f u n d   r a i s e r   t e d (+)